PROSPECT provides clinicians with supporting arguments for and against the use of various interventions in postoperative pain based on published evidence and expert opinion. Clinicians must make judgements based upon the clinical circumstances and local regulations. At all times, local prescribing information for the drugs referred to must be consulted. Grades of recommendation (GoR) are assigned according to the overall level of evidence (LoE) on which the recommendations are based, which is determined by the quality and source of evidence.
Grades of recommendation (GoR) based on source and level of evidence (LoE): Summary table
An explanation of how study quality assessments are performed to determine the LoE and GoR can be found at the following link: https://archive.postoppain.org/methodology/
The AGREE II instrument (Brouwers 2010) is used internationally to assess the methodological rigour and transparency of practice guidelines. As far as possible, the methodology of the PROSPECT Thoracotomy review meets the requirements of ‘Domain 3: Rigour of development’ of the AGREE II instrument:
Note: Unless otherwise stated, ‘pre-operative’ refers to interventions applied before surgical incision
Note: Analgesics should be administered at the appropriate time (pre- or intra-op) to provide sufficient analgesia in the early recovery period
Note: Unless otherwise stated, ‘intra-operative’ refers to interventions applied after incision and before wound closure
The operative technique used should depend on factors other than pain (GoR D) (New evidence is available that video-assisted surgery is less painful)
Note: Unless otherwise stated, ‘postoperative’ refers to interventions applied at or after wound closure
Algorithm for the management of postoperative pain for Thoracotomy
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.